Silvana Muscella, CEO of Trust-IT Services, enquired whether it would be possible to have Bureau Veritas certify other similar projects or services, and what further developments were envisaged. Jakob relied that “the project comes to an end in December 2018 and is now in the running the pilot projects with the tools and methodologies to go ready and live in the next couple of months, showing the results including the bankability of the project”. Jakub outlined the laboriousness developing the Green Rating scheme, taking four years and only now is it becoming a certification scheme, while the Green Rating for EPC took an additional two years. Further developments would include looking at other building typologies and data centres to make the tool more ICT-specific.
ICTFOOTPRINT.eu has the SAT-S (Self-Assessment Tool for ICT Services) available, a useful, free, quick and easy-to-use tool to support stakeholders make informed decisions on the calculation of their carbon footprint of ICT services. The tool is a first attempt to provide ICT-intensive organisations with a practical mechanism to position their ICT services footprint. In early 2018, ICTFOOTPRINT.eu launches SAT-O (Self-Assessment Tool for Organizations), allowing organisations to calculate their overall ICT carbon footprint due to the digital services provided & used by the organisation.
Microsoft Carbon Fee – A carbon fee-scheme to become 100% carbon neutral
Adina Braha-Honciuc, showcased Microsoft sustainability strategy. Microsoft has operating data centres and the rest of the company at 100% carbon neutrality since 2012. Today, roughly 40% of the company’s electricity comes from renewable sources with a goal to pass the 50% mark by 2018 and top 60% early next decade. In this respect, two new energy deals have just been concluded, one in Ireland and one in the Netherlands where two new wind farms are being built with Microsoft acquiring 100% of the energy produced. As to the global cloud infrastructure, the company will increasingly turn to renewable energy as a cleaner power source with greater financial predictability. Cloud-based programmes to reduce resource consumption have already contributed to the 20% global energy reduction and the power bill and the data collected on energy consumption have laid the groundwork to acquire the companies own green energy at the market rate.
Adina moved on to explain the Microsoft’s carbon fee scheme. This involves assessment of emissions for a given year, a forward prediction of electricity consumption, with a budget based on those emissions. The price level is then set based by calculating the investment needed and dividing this by the business group emissions. In this way, 9 million tonnes of carbon equivalent have been reduced since 2012 and 14 billion kWh of green power purchased. The innovation fund put together with the carbon fee finances investments in the sustainability area and provides incentive for different business groups to put together sustainability projects, as each can bid for one in their region, or country.
Adina brought the Microsoft WattTime tool to the table as an example, a software used to automatically detect the precise carbon emissions caused by using or generating electricity at any time and place in Europe in real-time. The tool informs operators of energy-consuming equipment from smartphones to large energy storage facilities or entire hydro-electric dams of the carbon implications of consuming or producing energy at particular times. Armed with this data, consumers and operators can adjust their behaviour and their operating plans to instantly achieve emission reductions at a very low cost.
Another Microsoft’s project is “AI for Earth” (Artificial Intelligence for Earth) aimed at putting the power of AI towards solving some of the biggest environmental challenges of our time. With a 2-million-dollar commitment in this fiscal year, researchers can apply with proposals to this project and MS will offer grants consisting in access to cloud and AI computing resources, technology training and other kinds of educational facilities.
Different, quicker, faster, and better: A Formula 1 approach to data centre construction
Derek Webster, CEO at Data Center Consultancy Adget, started his presentation stating that the data centre sector is predicted to grow by three times the energy use over the next ten years. This can be offset slightly if GDP growth is looked at and the flow of data GDP which has grown by 10% considering industries impacted by the net and moving data across it, equated to something like 3.8 trillion dollars of additional trade. So, while its good for GDP, it has consequences in terms of energy use and this must be addressed in a sector that represents 2% of global greenhouse gases.
If a Formula 1 way of thinking was to be adopted this would translate into how you could be different, quicker, faster, and better than the rest that tech usually filters down. But what is more important is to look at where the total energy is actually used.
“If you look at the most efficient data centres around the world, then 9.1% of the energy actually consumed is not the ICT kit, that is the servers or routers, the switches that live in the data centre space, so the data centre is the envelope and environment that houses the ICT kit. So, when other buildings are looked at, 9.1% of efficiency of the infrastructure itself represents one of the world’s most efficient structures for purpose”.
A topic also gaining importance is how to re-use energy. Northern countries do well as they have combined heat and power. A key may also be to keep a data centre in a cooler climate. However, the ICT kit remains predominately the issue, how this is utilised, how efficiently it’s set up and the software that used to alternate as much as possible. Location, generation, and how the power is used are key in reducing energy and carbon cost.
Derek brought the example of a formula 1 project started in 2006 that went live in 2011 to the table. In this case the Yahoo data centre location was highly unusual, as this was on top of an archaeological site in Switzerland, so the construction was carefully carried out around this. Instead of building a new centre from scratch, Yahoo used an old factory site instead. Derek highlighted that it’s not just the infrastructure but its impact on its location that counts.
Plus, one of the main benefits of locating the data centre in Switzerland was the fact this country has 95% hydro power. An additional fee was payed to ensure that the energy came entirely from hydro source. Rain water was gathered to help run the cooling. Water was bought from the village to run the heating systems onsite and generator sets were used to keep them warm for starting.
When Silvana asked how Europe faired with respect to other global partners. Derek replied that in comparison to his work around the globe in data centre construction, the EU approach is ahead in thinking and performance and that designs are ahead of the US market. He went on to mention that at the EU commission Energy Sustainability week, one of the speakers from the session on the European Code of Conduct mentioned that the American companies were not nearly as advanced. In addition, Derek added that speaking to Microsoft’s ex-head of data centre deployment for EU, it was mentioned that due to the way the EU handles construction, Microsoft extensively use EU companies for design in Europe and across the globe.